Search for: "United States v. Murphy"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States, to name but a few. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
The Federalist states flatly that under the Clause the President must make the appointment “during the recess. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm
We’re not aware of this yet being done yet in the United States - by all means tell us if we're wrong - but a litigation hold order precluding plaintiff from deleting social media information was recently issued in Canada. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
Not surprisingly, Macumber was convicted and sentenced to life.I don't know how many factually innocent people are in prison in the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm
The RICO Act, or the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a federally mandated law that aims to combat the presence of organized crime in the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm
The RICO Act, or the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a federally mandated law that aims to combat the presence of organized crime in the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm
The RICO Act, or the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a federally mandated law that aims to combat the presence of organized crime in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Art Museums in the United States While there are a few examples of public (e.g., Smithsonian museums) and for-profit (e.g., International Spy Museum) museums, the majority of museums in the United States—especially art museums—are nonprofit organizations with a 501(c)(3) status.[3] This means that most museums in this country are considered charities described under both § 501(c)(3) and § 170(c)(2), receiving most tax benefits among 29… [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am
The Marquette Law School poll, which was conducted just days after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
Murphy, and S.e E. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm
United States (1919). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 1:59 pm
See, e.g., Murphy v. [read post]
