Search for: "United States v. Rodriguez"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 10:35 am
While the order isn't yet up on CAAF's web site, I understand that the court denied the petition to reconsider its ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:53 am
SENTENCING/PLEA AGREEMENTUnited States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:00 pm
United States on 1/26/09 and filed in Cook v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
Rodriguez, 461 F. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 4:29 am
Today the defense filed this opposition to the Government's motion to strike the defense's reconsideration petition in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:11 am
Yesterday the Government asked CAAF to strike the defense's reconsideration petition in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:15 pm
Here's a corrected link to the defense's reply to the Government's opposition to the reconsideration petition in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 2:04 pm
" United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:08 am
The defense has filed its reply to the Government's opposition to the reconsideration petition in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:08 pm
Before they can meaningfully reform the image of the United States in foreign [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:30 pm
Take a look at the certificate of service on page 9 of the Government's opposition to the petition for reconsideration in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:28 am
The Government has filed its opposition to the recon petition in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:39 am
On Friday, the defense filed a petition seeking reconsideration in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 3:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
A federal court can sometimes issue a writ of habeas corpus due to the violation of a federal statute in addition to the violation of the United States Constitution. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:29 pm
Oh they'll stay in touch with a civilian counsel, but for some reason don't do that as much with military appellate counsel.And don't forget United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
