Search for: "United States v. Ryan"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm
Air Force personnel in Germany (United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm
CAAF today issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
United States, the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Ryan, in which the Court will consider whether and when an inmate has a constitutional right to effective counsel in post-conviction proceedings, and Kurns v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:00 am
United States on SSRN. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
United States. 36 Colum. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
United States. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:55 pm
The US Department of Justice has an institutional interest in Arizona winning, because the United States has a capital punishment law of its own to enforce. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:29 am
The Court also invited the Acting Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Ryan v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm
The opinion, in its own inimitable way, calls on the Texas Legislature to address the fragmented design of the Texas judiciary: Intrepidity at the Alamo; entering the United States as the Republic of Texas; fifty-eight Texas-born recipients of the Medal of Honor; Bob Wills and George Strait; Nolan Ryan and Babe Didrikson Zaharias; five Super Bowl titles (sadly none this millennium); Dr Pepper and the “little creamery” in Brenham; deep-fried anything at the… [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Ryan (Southern Methodist University) Discussant: Richard H. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(TTABlog) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of JEWELRYSUPPLY.COM: No tacking and not enough 2(f): In re Jewelry Supply Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal of the “Eddie Bauer Guarantee” for failure to function as a service mark: In re Eddie Bauer Licensing Services LLC (TTABlog) TTAB dismisses fraud-based opposition for failure to prove intent to deceive: Daniel Ryan Way and CMDW, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:34 pm
United States. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/05/02/10-10079.pdf United States v. [read post]
