Search for: "United States v. Yielding" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2018, 10:38 am by Charlotte Garden
… The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:52 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  The decision is almost surely to be challenged on grounds that it is at odds with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Vatican has unilaterally halted the United States bishops from moving forward with new responses to the clergy sex abuse crisis, which they were planning to release this week during their annual meeting. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:41 am by Andy Grewal
Statutes in that form pervade the United States Code. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am by Florian Mueller
On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is scheduled to commence a limited damages retrial in the first Apple v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm by Stephen Griffin
”  Dorf’s nonoriginalist alternative ground, very popular among living constitutionalists, is the contemporary acceptance of the Constitution by the people of the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Second, the drug is neither prescribed by a doctor or psychiatrist nor dispensed by a pharmacist, and has not been studied in the United States to determine its interaction with other drugs. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
  “Although the United States agrees with [Davis] that the question presented is an important and recurring one on which there is a conflict among the courts of appeals and state supreme courts, this case is not a good vehicle to resolve that question,” the Department argued. [read post]