Search for: "WIT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. US "
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 3:30 am
Coach Services, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:42 am
B & B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:12 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:01 am
” See C and J Leasing Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:57 am
National Products, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:22 pm
Osmose, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
" See C and J Leasing Corp. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:41 am
District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina (EEOC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
" Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:57 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) established the test federal (and many state) judges currently use to determine the admissibility of expert testimony in trials and other proceedings. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 11:48 am
Lakebridge Condominium Association, Inc., 2010 WL 2354140 (11th Cir. 2010). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
See Biogen Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579 which, in federal courts, displaced the Frye general acceptance standard based upon the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
SOMA ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am
The AmeriKat suggests that if you have not seen Food, Inc., you must. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Amicus brief of Paralyzed Veterans of America Amicus brief of the United Spinal Association Title: Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
The case then proceeded before Judge Kessler (without a jury), running for nine months, with live testimony from 84 witnesses, written testimony from 162, and nearly 14,000 exhibits. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Tailor to Australia—use flavour and colour. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:43 pm
More specifically, the appeal concerns the reliability of expert witness testimony under Daubert [Daubert v. [read post]
