Search for: "Washington v. Texas"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Washington. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:50 am
See, e.g., Furst v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Joan Meier discusses Ohio v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am
Also looking forward, David Schenck writes for the Texas Tribune that Citizens will almost certainly contribute to the end of direct elections for state judges: in combination with the Court’s decisions in Republican Party v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:41 pm
FCC and Miami Herald v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am
Abbott v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Texas.)For Blackmun, Roe was transformative. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
In Buck v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
In an op-ed for the Washington Times (3/9) Jim Copland, director of the Center for Legal Policy and Paul Howard, director of the Center for Medical Progress at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, write, "Pharmaceutical manufacturers in America now face a...hazardous path...after the Supreme Court ruled yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
In an op-ed for the Washington Times (3/9) Jim Copland, director of the Center for Legal Policy and Paul Howard, director of the Center for Medical Progress at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, write, "Pharmaceutical manufacturers in America now face a...hazardous path...after the Supreme Court ruled yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
” In The George Washington Law Review, Robin Maher discusses last week’s decision in Buck v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
University of Texas at Austin, commentators continue to speculate about and debate the possible outcomes of these cases. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 8:55 am
The Government does also invoke in its stay motion an out-of-circuit precedent, Washington v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
Also speaking was Anthony Graves, who was freed from prison in Texas last October after 12 years on death row and six years in prison. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 7:39 am
” At the Huffington Post, Stacy Seicshnaydre discusses the oral argument, and in particular a question posed by the Chief Justice, in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Warley, Schechter Poultry v. [read post]
