Search for: "Will Baude" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 11:22 am by UChicagoLaw
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Will Baude looks at John Stinneford's article on the Eighth Amendment and Miranda and Michael Mukasey's recent WSJ op-ed. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:45 am
Last week, I happened to read the latest article from Professor John Stinneford of the University of Florida Law School. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, Will Baude responds to comments on an earlier post (which I covered in last week’s round-up) regarding the validity of a new rule that prohibits non-lawyers from arguing at the Court. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 1:40 pm
Friday, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey had an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal responding to Attorney General Eric Holder’s recent criticism of felon disenfranchisement law. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:06 pm by UChicagoLaw
and price competition among law schools in Kansas City; Becker and Posner look at whether or not excess college enrollments are a myth; Eric Posner looks at the campaign contributions of Obama's ambassadors; and Will Baude muses on SCOTUS and same-sex marriage, Cass Sunstein's new book, and SCOTUS's requirement that one need be a lwayer to argue in front of them. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:21 am by John Steele
William Baude, at Volokh, looks at the court's rule (which says no) and a statute (which seems to say yes). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:45 am
Last week I posted about a potential problem with the Supreme Court’s new rule 28.8, which requires you to be a lawyer to orally argue your case in front of the Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 6:10 am
I don’t necessarily agree with everything Cass Sunstein writes (see previously), but the blurbs on the back cover make me want to buy his new book, Conspiracy Theories and Other Dangerous Ideas. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 6:11 am
Several people have observed the unanimity in recent federal-court decisions so far about same-sex marriage. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:44 am
Eric has (of course) a response to my post from earlier this week on the reasons for being an originalist — especially my claim that originalism is part of American legal practice, part of our law, even if it isn’t necessarily a part of everyone’s. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:57 am
I just spent a while listening to the oral argument in Notre Dame v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:13 am by UChicagoLaw
Eric Posner and Will Baude discuss the sixth class in their seminar on originalism. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
If the Posner-Baude debates inspire you to read one actual article, make it that one.] [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:08 am by UChicagoLaw
On The Volokh Conspiracy, Will Baude looks at the legality of the Supreme Court's recently codified rule requiring those making oral arguments before it to be attorneys admitted to the bar. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:14 am by Amy Howe
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Will Baude analyzes the validity of a new Supreme Court Rule, Rule 28.8, which prohibits non-lawyers from arguing at the Court. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:28 pm by UChicagoLaw
Will Baude and Eric Posner continue their debate on orginalism, Baude on The Volokh Conspiracy and Posner on his blog. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The Supreme Court recently codified a rule — apparently reflecting its longstanding practice — that you can only orally argue before the court if you are a lawyer. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by UChicagoLaw
On his blog, Posner clarifies an earlier post on Noel Canning in response to Will Baude and posts a graph showing the ratio of federal employees to legislative employees. [read post]