Search for: "York v. York"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 47,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 9:53 am
Bartfield v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:41 pm
David Paterson, New York would no longer be the only state that doesn’t allow no-fault divorce. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 9:15 am
The issues of contingent commissions and producer compensation disclosure has reached the forefront of New York regulatory law, as the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department recently ruled in favor of the insurance industry in the matter of People v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:05 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:09 am
As we wrote in our September 14, 2012 blog, New York Governor Signs Legislation Broadening Scope of Permissible Wage Deductions under New York Labor Law, section 193 of the NYLL was amended to permit additional types of deductions to which an employee could consent. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:22 pm
Such was the case in Matter of Incorporated Village of Patchogue v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:21 am
In our July 6, 2015 Blog, New York City Mayor De Blasio Signs Ban-the-Box Legislation, we wrote about New York City’s enactment of the Fair Chance Act (FCA), which amends the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) to prohibit most New York City employers from inquiring into or otherwise considering an applicant’s criminal history prior to making a conditional offer of employment. [read post]
SCOTUSBlog Special Feature: Symposium before the oral argument in Department of Commerce v. New York
3 Apr 2019, 1:18 pm
New York. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 8:56 am
this is known as the Rosario Rule pursuant to People v Rosario, 9 NY 2d 286 and CPL 240.44, 240.45. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:44 pm
This was the situation encountered by the Court in Perosi v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 6:22 pm
However, in Kakwani v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
Or, more accurately, yes, we could, but not after People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:09 am
However, a recent decision in the matter of Williams v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:36 pm
Scope Disputes: Although the new and amended statutory sections should not disturb the 1997 decision I obtained for Nationwide in Kawa v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:05 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:43 am
And this musical commemoration of LSU v. [read post]
