Search for: "APPLICATION OF STEWART" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm by Gideon
The possession of adult pornography, in the words of Justice Stewart, is not that. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:33 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
(since question of law would be involved, stipulation could not have operated to control the court and prevent finding on facts which might, when applicable law and legal principles were applied, compel conclusion); Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Beyond Intractability
For instance, scholars have noted that members of high-context cultures are often uncomfortable with direct confrontation and would prefer mediations with more caucusing rather than direct negotiations.9 In this view, the general principles of mediation are applicable cross-culturally (see, for example, Myers and Filner 1997). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:06 am by Max Kennerly
Proximate cause is established where the defendant’s conduct was a “substantial factor” in bringing about the injury (Stewart v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:16 pm by Walter Olson
” Tags: airlines, Canada Related posts Update: “Quebec passengers sue TB-infected U.S. lawyer” (12) Payne Stewart air crash verdict (0) No more ranters in the next seat? [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Paralegal Mentor
Stewart, Goldman & Rosen, LTDCincinnati Angela M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:33 am by WSLL
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Stewart M. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm by Josh Blackman
The title of this post captures a current blogosphere disagreement between Dave Kopel and Doug Berman regarding the interpretation of the Second Amendment in Ezell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:33 pm by Perry Herzfeld
A court in Australia hearing the application for recognition must be satisfied that all the preconditions are satisfied and, if they are, what relief should be granted. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:03 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Indeed, there is no Commerce Clause precedent in which the Supreme Court has upheld the broader statute but invalidated its application to a specific individual. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by William Hamilton
Much litigation is still stuck on the case-specific level of discussing and testing the application of Boolean search terms. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
Regardless of location and background, we have strong intuitions about it, echoing Justice Potter Stewart’s famous threshold test for pornography “I know it when I see it. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:47 am
Birley Robin Birley (left) is the son of Lady Annabel Vane-Tempest-Stewart, daughter of the 8th Marquess of Londonderry and Mark Birley, son of the society portrait painter Sir Oswald Birley. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:23 am by gmlevine
” A good example of an applicant with a famous name but untested and descriptive trademark and no proof of “substantial media attention” prior to the registration of the domain name is Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:20 am by WSLL
Pojman, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Stewart M. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:58 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in Jacobellis v. [read post]