Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
She filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
Locke v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
In Locke v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
5 years ago, in U.S. v. [read post]
Case o' The Week: First Impression, Depression - Cervantes and Cali "Mandatory Supervision" Searches
25 Jun 2017, 8:13 am
Jaywalking is dangerous.United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
Every woman's dream red solesCan a colour be considered akin to a shape, so that a sign that consists exclusively of a colour "which gives substantial value to the goods" cannot be registered as a trade mark? [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Ashcroft and Golan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Charlie’s Waste Services, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Charlie’s Waste Services, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
., United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:08 pm
[v] DeGenaro, supra note 1, at 1041. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:08 pm
[v] DeGenaro, supra note 1, at 1041. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:08 pm
[v] DeGenaro, supra note 1, at 1041. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:49 am
That decision, in Abood v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
All casebooks will prominently feature discussions of the ambiguous passages in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:01 am
In Newhook v. [read post]
