Search for: "All Tools, Inc. v. United States"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff perpetuated a good deal of mischief and misinformation to keep his myth that all fiber types are the same (and that “asbestos is asbestos is asbestos”). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[6] MPEP § 707.07(f) incorrectly states that an examiner “should” answer all material traversed; it’s a statutory “must. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:52 pm
Power Ventures and United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46) New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office) South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP) Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46) Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for ‘Made in… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
First, it included a choice of law clause (cl 1): ‘[A]ny and all disputes between Carrier and any Guest shall be governed exclusively and in every respect by the general maritime law of the United States without regard to its choice of law principles … To the extent such maritime law is not applicable, the laws of the State of California (U.S.A.) shall govern the contract, as well as any other claims or disputes arising out of that relationship. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
Taking time to make changes needed to find and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:54 pm
Greenmoss Builders, Inc. (1985)). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:59 am
Another tool for policyholders in state court (but not federal) is the Offer of Judgment rule, R. 4:58. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:59 am
Another tool for policyholders in state court (but not federal) is the Offer of Judgment rule, R. 4:58. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 9:39 am
Nonprofit agencies must ensure that blind or other severely disabled individuals perform at least 75% of all ODLH per fiscal year. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Dinwoodie: state of law or practice? [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Google, Inc., 2007 U.S. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ… [read post]
