Search for: "Andrews v. State" Results 1061 - 1080 of 4,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2019, 5:18 pm by Kate Ross
Aug. 7, 2019), Justice Andrew Borrok of the New York County Commercial Division stayed discovery pending a motion to dismiss a federal securities class action pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”), diverging from the handful of state courts that have grappled with that statute’s application since the Supreme Court’s ruling last year in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:16 am by David Sloss
After the Civil War, the Court invalidated a wartime seizure of property in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:45 pm by Andrew Berger
Andrew will be a panelist in a webinar on November 1 sponsored by PLI dealing with the tension between Sections 109(a) and 602(a)(1) of the Copyright Act following the Second Circuit’s decision in John Wiley v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm by Christopher Danzig
Peck, Andrew Peck, Class Action, Computer-assisted review, Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:43 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Background And Methodology In April 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am by SHG
  And in the case raised by Andrew, Welch v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:33 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: KEVIN EUGENE KIDWELL v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Someone could have put their hand in the window and unlocked the door and taken the kids” [Lenore Skenazy/Free Range Kids; related stories here and here; similar, Illinois Policy] Police warn that plan in Scotland to provide state guardian for every child could backfire in abuse investigations [Telegraph, more on “named person” scheme] Also from Scotland: Law Society says proposed ban on liquor promotion is so broad it might snag parent wearing rugby-sponsor… [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Andrew Pincus, amicus for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, finished up Respondent’s argument by first addressing Justice Liu’s question regarding a modified Gentry rule. [read post]