Search for: "Application of Thomas" Results 1061 - 1080 of 8,032
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 6:31 pm by moderator
 Judge Thomas Woodall of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's conviction.State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm by FDABlog HPM
Further, the interim rule seeks to clarify any confusion about the definition of a “sole manufacturer” by defining that term as “an applicant that is the only entity currently manufacturing a drug product . . . whether the product is manufactured by the applicant or for the applicant under contract with one or more different entities. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:33 pm by Elaine Hou
Many thanks to Cato Research Fellow Thomas Berry, and colleagues Nicholas DeBenedetto and David Meyer-Lindenberg, for their help thinking through these issues [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 3:45 am
The referring Justices - Thomas in Donofrio and Scalia in Wrotnowski - are both solid members of the Court's conservative bloc. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
[numerous citations omitted.]I thank the prevailing defense attorney, Thomas MacDonald of the Pittsburgh law firm of Summers, MacDonald, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel for bringing this case to my attention.Anyone desiring a copy of this opinion may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:16 am by Paul Jacobson
Giggs and other super-injunction applicants face a number of practical challenges enforcing their orders. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:00 pm
The question presented by Timbs is whether the Excessive Fines Clause is incorporated by the 14th Amendment and therefore applicable to the states. [read post]
Thomas also advocated USPTO involvement in Orange Book patent review, encouraging legislation creating “Orange Book Listing Review (OBLR)” proceedings to be conducted by the PTAB in which APJs would review patent claims alongside the specification of an approved New Drug Application. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:06 pm by Tyler Gillett
The majority of the Justices denied the application without publishing an opinion, while Justices, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, dissented. [read post]