Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 14,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; People v… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:28 pm
From State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:27 am
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is AFL Telecommunications, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:15 am
Thanks for bearing with me through this. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
See Owen v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am
” All of this, whether a state statute is “divisible” or not, is an abstract inquiry the outcome of which bears concrete consequences, years of a person’s life. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am
” All of this, whether a state statute is “divisible” or not, is an abstract inquiry the outcome of which bears concrete consequences, years of a person’s life. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
Brown Jr. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:31 pm
(Bond v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:46 pm
Maloney’s petition in Maloney v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 9:53 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
With this background, we recently read the State of Michigan’s opening brief in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Holder after Arizona’s plan was created, it has no bearing on the issue whether the State’s attempt to comply with the Voting Rights Act is a legitimate state interest. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 6:01 pm
" Most prominently, tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
One traditional method of accomplishing these ends is to demonstrate through questioning that the witness has been guilty of prior immoral, vicious or criminal conduct bearing on credibility (cite omitted). [read post]
