Search for: "Belt v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
Censors should be independent, not just of the state, but of other interest groups, such as the industry itself, and yes, the child protection sector. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:42 pm
" That phrase came to mind when reading CGCCA's opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 12:21 am
., v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
In any event, however, resolving the ambiguity of the language of the exclusion against Arch, the exclusion does not apply to Pav-Lak (see Belt Painting Corp. v TIG Ins. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Most notably, in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:39 pm
n a case called Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Ketchum v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Two more notable examples came across my desk just today: In US v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:13 pm
"So the woman who can't name a case other than Roe v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:56 pm
Second, the court stated that the Sheriff's Department wanted defendant to wear the stun belt. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:34 pm
This holding was furthered in the cases of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:14 pm
A case in point: if an auto manufacturer has met federal design minimums (remember, they can always design a product more safely than the minimum standards dictate), the manufacturer will say that the government has "approved" the design, and that it shouldn't be subject to litigation if the design proves faulty, regardless whether the design failure involves exploding gas tanks, failing seat belts ( see our litigation against GM about this Farnsworth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
South Cambs relied on a number of Green Belt cases, and then suggested Judge Gilbart QC’s comments in McCarthy v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2006] EWCA (Admin) 3287 set a precedent. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
As for the nature of the punishment inflicted by Matthew, I observe that J.M. received approximately ten blows from Matthew's hand and a belt. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
"Evans v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
In Wrinkles v. [read post]
