Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 1061 - 1080 of 10,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2022, 7:13 pm by Josh Blackman
Moreover, petitioner's position that resignation and a promise not to seek future office clears the slate would encourage Judges to disregard the high standards of conduct they are bound to observe and "avoid the consequences of removal for cause by racing to resign"-- a practice rejected by this Court (Matter of Quinn v State Commn. on Judicial Conduct, 54 NY2d 386, 395). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 1:38 am by Florian Mueller
Also, the European Court of Justice decided earlier this year that preliminary injunctions must be available to patentees who show a likelihood of success on the merits, so in Germany and other EU member states we may also see SEP injunctions soon (if not in Ericsson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:08 pm by Shelley Welton
The Supreme Court finally delivered its long-awaited opinion in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:13 am by Samuel Bray
Earlier this week, a panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Arizona v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
Nevertheless, presenting these claims in an arbitration, even though only for penalties, would be analogous to the bringing of class or group actions that the Court had held outside the Act.On the second, a public agency dedicated to the enforcement of labor protective law—in the case, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)—not being bound by any agreement to arbitrate was free to perform its mission on behalf of any complaining employee, even one who was… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am by CMS
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]