Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 5:52 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Congress . . . for the Title  – Raleigh attorney David Smyth of Brooks Pierce on their blog, Cady Bar the Door Plugging Profitability Leaks: A Simple Tip for Great Delegation – Pam Woldow & Dough Richardson on Pam’s blog, At The Intersection For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "Nonetheless, the complaint must be dismissed because plaintiff failed to show that any negligence on defendants' part proximately caused it to be unable to exploit the commercial permit (see Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267-268 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 3:39 pm
Goldsmith and once in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:24 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  They could be referring to the procedural default rule, the anti-retroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]