Search for: "CARTER v. STATE"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Godard v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:51 pm
The only notable lower court decision is State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 11:51 am
Carter, 390 So. 2d 816, 817 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1980). [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 9:08 pm
On the Florida Bar’s side are pro-democracy reform groups, historians of judicial elections, professors of law and political science, groups that are strong foes of the influence of money in politics, eleven states with similar solicitation bans, state and local judicial reform organizations, the Conference of Chief Justices [of the states], former Florida chief justices and bar leaders, the American Bar Association (which advocates such a ban in its code of judicial… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 10:57 am
Carter v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 6:48 am
He suggested that Clapper v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 6:34 am
Examining Judge Sotomayor's years as a New York state prosecutor Examining Judge Sotomayor's criminal justice record [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Saunier v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
§ 1983 fails to state explicitly that punitive damages can be awarded. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am
Carter also suggested that his concerns are widely shared: “The United States joins virtually everyone else in the region in being deeply concerned about the pace and scope of land reclamation. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
The next year, in Carter v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
However, if a neutral is available, the CanLII source identification is unnecessary and should be omitted: Carter v Canada, 2015 SCC 5. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:37 am
This is one of many interesting free speech questions raised in Carter v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:51 am
As the case was filed before commencement of the special session it should have been dismissed if filed in Federal Court just like Carter v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:09 pm
Carter, The Confirmation Mess (1994). [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
