Search for: "California v. Jones"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 10:31 am
MEDICAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Download JONES v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
Another memorable ruling by Stevens came in 1997 in Clinton v Jones, regarding Paula Jones' civil lawsuit against President Bill Clinton - which launched a chain of events leading to Clinton's impeachment. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:42 am
Cal. 2005) and Horn v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 3:05 pm
Jones v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 11:53 am
There are some sticky issues under the US Supreme Court decision, Keller v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The jury concluded late Tuesday that Microsoft willfully infringed on patents held by VirnetX, and awarded the California technology licensing company $105.8 million. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:42 pm
Barnes, and Professor Trina Jones, University of California Irvine School of Law, A Post-race Equal Protection? [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:47 am
Jones, No. 09-1009-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
The controversial Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:54 pm
Last July, in an entry titled Incentive Awards Ok, but Not Incentive Agreements, I commented on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (10th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of the American Legion Department of California Amicus brief of nine states Title: CropLife America v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:25 am
The court upheld prison restrictions denying plaintiff permission to grow his hair, prohibiting him from performing pipe ceremonies in his cell, and limiting vendors from whom he could buy a headband.In Jones v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:22 pm
DivorceIn Gill v. [read post]
