Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 4,427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2020, 4:16 am
One Wholesaler, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 8:02 am
Let's say that in California v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:48 pm
Affairs v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 1:47 pm
City of Philadelphia, which involves the intersection of nondiscrimination laws and religious rights, and California v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm
There have been insurer-favorable decisions on motions to dismiss in federal courts out of Texas, Florida, Kansas, California, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois, Georgia and Minnesota and in state courts in Illinois, Michigan, Florida, California and the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
Texas explicitly makes it a felony to collect ballots “with intent to defraud the voter or the election authority. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:42 am
Here: Ysleta Cert Petition Question presented: Whether the Restoration Act provides the Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), as set forth in the plain language of Section 107(b), the Act’s legislative history, and this Court’s holding in California v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:50 pm
The case was Kanter v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:48 am
That changed abruptly in 2017 with the Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:55 pm
On both points, we also make some arguments that do not appear in the briefs in the California v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 2:19 pm
But that's not the question raised in California v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 6:33 am
Vik Amar, Evan Caminker and I offer our analysis of the question before the Supreme Court in California v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:50 am
In a post published yesterday, I explained why Amy Coney Barrett is unlikely to vote to strike down the entire Affordable Care Act in Texas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:45 am
Over at Justia, Vik Amar, Evan Caminker and I have posted a new essay on California v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
And she said California v. [read post]
