Search for: "Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 3:41 am
” The rules for Congressional hearings, though, are a bit different from the rules for a deposition in civil litigation in federal court. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Welcome to Blawg Review Number 117: the Bill of Rights/Criminal Law Edition.Approximately 5% of previous Blawg Review hosts have blogs related to criminal law, and not all of them practice and/or blog exclusively about criminal defense: Appellate Law &;amp; Practice, Crime and Federalism, JAG Central, Blonde Justice, Concurring Opinions, and Public Defender Stuff.This week, I will supplement the usual suspects’ contributions (i.e.… [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:38 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held that the Bankruptcy Code pre-empts California's preference statute, California Code of Civil Procedure section 1800. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
In addition to enacting the provisions of the uniform act, North Carolina added subsection (f) to Rule 45 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
” This is particularly clear from the language in the subsection titled “Procedural Posture, Evergreen’s Contentions, and Civil Code Section 3482? [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
This summary provides links to more in-depth case write-ups on the firm’s blog. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:15 am
Because the bank followed that procedure in good faith, it was protected from court sanctions under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(e) “safe harbor. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 11:59 am
In 2015, Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was amended to spell out the required showing to obtain sanctions for the loss of electronically stored information (ESI). [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 3:33 pm
Walters & Mason Retail, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:59 pm
Nearly all the technical pleading requirements are found in Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 420-475 in state practice and in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rules 7-15 for federal practice. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Koninklijke Philips Electronics Docket: 09-389 Issue: Whether a party contesting the jurisdiction of the district court must first move to vacate or set aside a default judgment pursuant to either Rule 55(c) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the District Court as a prerequisite to appealing the default judgment. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:00 pm
” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 1:00 pm
Maintain caseload on behalf of Native American clients in both civil and criminal matters in tribal court or arising under federal or tribal law. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
See prior post on this blog: Seeing No Evil Texas Supreme Court blesses diversion of lawsuit against payday lender over egregious criminal collection tactics into private arbitration. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 2:42 pm
Government seeks the content of emails from an email service provider, the Government must, in certain specified circumstances, use a warrant following the procedures in Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Glazer, 13-431, concerning the scope of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3)’s requirement that classwide issues predominate over individual ones. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
However, he gave them an opportunity to refile a motion to certify the class which complies with the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
Stephens 15-187Issue: (1) Whether a federal court of appeals is authorized to review sua sponte and invalidate an order reopening the time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6), when the appellee never appealed the order; (2) whether attorney abandonment, which Maples v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
The Bureau respectfully requests that the Court deny the motions to intervene filed by TSI, PHEAA, GSS, the Objecting Noteholders, and WTC, because they have failed to meet their burden for intervention under Rule 24(a)(2), or 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
