Search for: "Commonwealth of PA" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,846
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2013, 6:31 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The seminar took place in Scranton, PA and featured JP Cardoni and Leah Cardoni of Exhibit A, a digital pre-trial and trial support company, along with Attorney Melissa Scartelli of the Scranton, PA law office of Scartelli & Olszewski. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:54 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Leading the charge against the bill is Wendell Young IV, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 and chairman of UFCW of the PA Wine and Spirits Council. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Christopher I. McCabe, Esq.
In a recent, unreported decision concerning a bid protest for a state contract, the Pa. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:59 am by Susan Brenner
 540 Pa. 237, 656 A.2d 1341-42 [Pennsylvania Supreme Court 1995]. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:20 pm by Joel S. Barras
 Prior to Diehl, the UC Board and the Commonwealth Court treated early retirees as employees who voluntary quit their jobs. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 5:18 am
A new House Bill, HB 579, would amend the PHRA to define unlawful discriminatory practices to include employers that: Print, publish or advertise in any way a job opportunity in this Commonwealth that exclusively utilizes an Internet-based application for employment. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The bill now moves to the PA Senate, where it now sits in the Labor and Industry Committee, for consideration. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Christopher I. McCabe, Esq.
Commonwealth Court held that a letter sent by a contractor to the Pa. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:23 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 3257 (ED PA, Jan. 9, 2013), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed on statute of limitations grounds claims of a Rastafarian inmate that he received meals that did not meet his vegetarian diet requirements.In Munn v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:08 am by Tom Cummings
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has consistently maintained that the rules governing pleadings in workers’ compensation cases do not mirror the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure and should be liberally construed. [read post]