Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm
(Public Citizen’s post announcing the filing of its amicus brief here.) [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:32 pm
From questioning today in King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
This mounting evidence of serious cost, financing and other concerns in state-run exchanges creates new reason for concern about the future of ACA’s health care reforms even for those citizens of states whose eligibility for subsidies is not challenged by the King v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
This prohibition does not apply when the children appear in a photograph or a recording engaged in a “regular activity. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:27 pm
In Germany v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:07 am
Let’s talk about King v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
But does it have any teeth, really? [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:16 am
Judge Rules Labeling Homosexuality A Mental Disorder Is Fraud Judge rejects media request to interview Omar Khadr Peel police deny handcuffing lawyer in her robesPeter MacKay’s friends, colleagues make up 6 of 9 judge appointees SCC sides with Law Societies as part of terror and money-laundering law ruled unconstitutionalToronto lawyer arrested at Brampton court, allegedly smuggling drugs into courthouse Abbotsford lawyer in living will case argues force… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
This figure does not include spending on Fútbol para todos (reported to be $1.28 billion in 2012, although the government does not disclose the amount). [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
If that’s the law, it will be functionally impossible to publish videos without the consent of every person depicted–a nonsensical standard in the age of citizen journalism and widespread video documentation of public activities. #3: Cybersecurity Breaches. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
U.S. law and the Constitution protect American citizens and legal residents from warrantless surveillance. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 4:55 pm
In the case of Pinto Pinheiro Marques v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
Public domain image. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
The federal court determined that Baidu’s search results were in fact the company’s own protected speech under the First Amendment (under the well-known case Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Law Society of British Columbia and Black v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
” (Citing Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:13 am
This does not solve the problem of the scope, but it now seems that part of the public sector rules mi [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 9:56 am
I exhibit at pages 20.9-22.1 of SM1 a list of all the organisations invited to the consultation forums and the mode of invitation, sign-in sheets from the public meetings showing attendance by representatives of organisations such as the Citizen’s Advice Bureau and a list of those who confirmed attendance at the public forums held on 11 and 12 February 2014. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
Troxel v.. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Hood v. [read post]
