Search for: "Cornell Law Review"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
ColbOn September 9, Professors Cornel West and Robert George visited Cornell Law School to engage in civil conversation about topics on which they might disagree. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:43 am
He is currently working on articles for the Indiana Law Journal and Harvard Law Review Online Forum. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
As I explained in a 2011 article in the Virginia Law Review, there can be more than one reasonable perception. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:05 am
These include Cornell's Legal Information Institute and the free law website Justia. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Megan Wright of Pennsylvania State University Law School, Keturah James and Adam Pan of Yale Law School, and Joseph Fins of Weill Cornell Medical College claim that the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Salceda, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits U.S. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Panel decisions are reviewed by the entire Board before being made public. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School and the principal author of The Oxford Introductions to U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In a justly famous 1960 law review article, the late civil rights lawyer and legal scholar Charles Black answered the contention that Jim Crow was separate but equal in this way: “if a whole race of people finds itself confined within a system which is set up and continued for the very purpose of keeping it in an inferior station, and if the question is then solemnly propounded whether such a race is being treated ‘equally,’ I think we ought to exercise one of the… [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm
One trillion dollars.The Debt Ceiling Statute is a Well Written, Bad Law: The Workarounds Do Not WorkSometimes, however, the underlying economic reality of a transaction is different from what the law recognizes. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 12:00 am
Gowder (Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law) have posted Birthright Citizenship and the Dunning School of Unoriginal Meanings (111 Cornell Law Review Online (forthcoming 2025)) on SSRN. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s refusal to review the merits). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:38 am
Wade [comments]North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 63, Issue 2 (January 1985), pp. 375-386Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (Cited 2619 times)63 N.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm
Wueller, Klein Moynihan Turco LLP The Impact of Internet Intermediary Liability, Craig S Wright Revisiting the Open Court Principle in an Era of Online Publication: Questioning Presumptive Public Access to Parties’ and Witnesses’ Personal Information, Ottawa Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2017, Jane Baileyand Jacquelyn Burkell, University of Ottawa – Common Law Section and University of Western Ontario Prioritizing Privacy in the Courts and… [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Substantially fewer than half thought the Baltimore police applied the law fairly, made fair and impartial decisions, understood and identified with the community, considered the views of those with whom they interacted, or applied the law regardless of race. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School and the principal author of The Oxford Introductions to U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Joseph Margulies is a Professor of Law and Government at Cornell University. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Joseph Margulies is a Professor of Law and Government at Cornell University. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
First, he makes a point of saying that “this Act [the Maryland law under review] manages to burden uniquely the sole group for whom the Fourth Amendment’s protections ought to be most jealously guarded: people who are innocent of the State’s accusations. [read post]
