Search for: "Deal v. USA"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
V. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am
This is going to be a big deal. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:07 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court in USA I Lehndorff Vermoegensverwaltung GmbH & Cie v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:17 am
In USA Today, Martha Moore suggests that those who know Kagan well have not been surprised at her success; CNN paints a similar picture. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– John Fllesher, The Associated Press, April 23, 2010 A federal bankruptcy judge approved a deal with the government on Friday that requires Lyondell Chemical Co. to pay $103 million toward the cleanup of a polluted 80-mile section of the Kalamazoo River in southwest Michigan. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
USA, 583 F.3d 766, 773 (Fed. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
Intertek USA, Inc., stands for the proposition that shift premiums preclude application of the FWW. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
TYR Sport, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
On April 9, the Texas Supreme Court granted review in Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:38 am
On the nominations side, Above the Law asks, “Is the Kagan Nomination a Done Deal? [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
Dickstein Shapiro (Patently-O) ITC: No s 337 violation; investigation terminated in Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same involving complainants LSI and Agere (ITC 337 Law Blog) Fleshing out design patent infringement doctrine: Crocs v ITC (Patently-O) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Billingnetwork Patent – Court orders plaintiff to file separate patent suits against each defendant: Billingnetwork… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
If so, Canada would be in good company, namely that of the USA itself. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:30 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al. and Gilead Sciences, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:36 am
Sam is an American trained lawyer and has expertise in both Canadian and American copyright law.Sam suggests that:The Act's fair dealing provisions should be amended to correspond with the values stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH v Law Society of Upper Canada [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 2:59 pm
This month, the Supreme Court is hearing a case that deals with the interplay between maritime contracts dealing with cargo shipments and the rules governing disputes for cargo transported on railways. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:02 am
See Roger v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Companies sometimes request that their flights and tail numbers be kept secret to protect the security of their executives and to prevent disclosure of business trips that could affect stock prices or give competitors an edge about potential deals. [read post]
