Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 12,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 5:42 am
I’m always hiring. [read post]
5 May 2023, 2:47 am
In the Court’s view, Article 82 requires establishing: (i) “damage”, either material or non-material; (ii) an actual infringement of the GDPR; and (iii) a causal link between the two. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Harper, the pending Supreme Court case involving the so-called “Independent State Legislature” interpretation of Articles I and II of the Constitution (ISL). [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:48 am
I also comment on differences between the leaked draft of the Regulation and the final version. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:58 am
Smart Study Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Bell Restaurant Group I LLC is a Louisville-based operator of four McDonald’s locations and part of Brdancat Management Inc., a larger enterprise that includes Jesse Bell I, Jesse Bell V, and Bell Restaurant Group II, which operates an additional 20 locations in Maryland, Indiana, and Kentucky. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
" In Part V, I propose dropping the word "powerful" in the first sentence, and deleting the remainder of the paragraph, except the last sentence, which I would introduce somewhat differently: "He contends that his claim is supported by the character of the office that was created by Article II of the Constitution, and by separation of powers principles, etc. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am
— (I) EFFECTIVENESS OF APPLICATION. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
The court is bound by the principles set out in Duffield, St Alkmund [2013] Fam 158, but this is not a case where it is suggested that the intended extension would harm the character of this Grade II listed church. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Even if the information meets the test, it does not necessarily follow that it would be proper for the defendant to disclose it. [read post]
1 May 2023, 11:20 am
Querino v Cambridge City Council. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:08 am
Holland Don Zara i. vi. 57 That Gods may view, With a Dildo-doe, What we bake, and what we brew.? [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Does government ‘do God? [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm
The consent decree requires the station to adopt a public file compliance plan but does not impose a fine. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Bristow v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:35 am
” Bowen v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
