Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 1061 - 1080 of 13,864
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2023, 10:45 pm by Tess Graham
Johnson (March 1, 2022) Ukrainian translation: Варіанти реагування ООН на російську агресію: можливості та “підводні… [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
  The Filing Fee Modernization Act did become law, boosting enforcement funding by a fraction of the $1 billion total necessary to restore it to a pre-Paradox level. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal ‘I Get My Butt Kicked Every 20 Minutes’: Life in a state legislature’s superminority MSN – Liz Crampton (Politico) | Published: 6/29/2023 There are 29 supermajorities in state Legislatures controlled by either Democrats or Republicans, up from 21 in 2019. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:08 pm by S & F Media LLC.
On March 29, 2023, the bill was referred to the Judiciary Committee. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the Irish courts have acknowledged that the law protects reasonable expectations of privacy CRH plc v Competition and Consumer Protection Commission [2017] IESC 34 (29 May 2017) [32] (Charleton J)), albeit that it does so by means of a (constitutional) tort of invasion of privacy (the leading case is Kennedy v Ireland [1987] IR 587 (doc | pdf) (Hamilton P); on the juridical nature of such a claim, see now McGee v Governor of… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm by Melody McDonald Lanier
Current law does not require such classification, as most fentanyl-related deaths as classified as an overdose. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:15 am by Douglas London
The result will be less-reliable Russian national security institutions, regardless of what Putin does now. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:15 am by Douglas London
The result will be less-reliable Russian national security institutions, regardless of what Putin does now. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The decision does not overrule the established requirement that an inference of serious harm to reputation for the purpose of s 1 must be supported by a contextual analysis of the specific facts of the case. [read post]