Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 1061 - 1080 of 47,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 12:28 pm by The Namby Pamby
I need them for a Court hearing tomorrow morning.Secretary: I’ll text him [Does so] He says he’ll be sending them out tonight.Me: Great. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:25 am by Employment Lawyers
Philly, Boston and DC Make the Grade - NYC Does NotAccording to a recent study from Forbes.com, Philadelphia is among the 10 happiest cities for younger workers. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:23 am by Charles Gallmeyer
The line we adopt today is just as administrable: Those who disseminate false statements with intent to defraud are primarily liable under Rules 10b-5(a) and (c), §10(b) [of the Exchange Act], and §17(a)(1) [of the Securities Act], even if they are secondarily liable under Rule 10b-5(b). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 6:35 am
The panel will discuss the products and services these technologies create or enable; the types of information that can be collected and how that information is used; and the associated benefits and privacy risks. 12:00-1:30pm Lunch 1:30-1:45pm Remarks, Commissioner Maureen K. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Penal Law §70.25(1)(a) provides, in relevant part, as follows: "1. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 11:13 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Appellant’s case is before this Court for mandatory review under Article 67(a)(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:24 am by Deirdre Wheatley-Liss
Don't forget that if your employer does not reimburse you for mileage, and you itemize, you might be able to deduct mileage on your 1040. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 3:02 am by familoo
“7.11 …For the avoidance of doubt applications for legal aid under section 10 of the Act (exceptional funding) in family proceedings which are listed in Part 1, Schedule 1, but where there is no evidence of domestic abuse or child abuse as required by paragraphs 12 and 13, will be considered by reference to the family criteria contained in Chapter 6. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The court clarified a number of issues relating to the scope of Art. 22 No 1, the obligations of the court second seised under Art. 27(1) as well as the relationship between Art. 22 No 1 and 27(1) Brussels I-Regulation. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
(Cal.App. 10/1/15) (discussed here), the Court of Appeal held as follows: a retaliation action under Labor Code section 1102.5 exists independently of, and does not depend upon, an action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy; section 1102.5 does not require the employee to show that the allegedly illegal activity violates a policy that "inures to the benefit of the public at large rather than to a particular employer or employee;" and… [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:53 pm
10-1-2008 Washington DC:Congress, again in the dead of the night and without notifying the public, has passed Sen. [read post]