Search for: "Does 1-30 defendants" Results 1061 - 1080 of 7,983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm by Nathan
  Likewise, we’ve long maintained that pay is not a huge factor in the quality of public defenders. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
Siller,  bya 2-1 vote game him a new trial. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:57 am
Where an insurer makes a timely and proper request for additional verification, the 30 day period in which it has to either pay or deny a claim does not begin to run until all demanded verification has been provided (11 NYCRR 65-3.8(a)(1)). [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:52 am by Michelle Yeary
     So, the score moves to 5 and 1 in favor of defendants in the honey litigation. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:30 am
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, December 30, 2009 Wilner v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff alleges that on January 30, 2014, Defendant entered her separate bedroom without warning and physically attacked and attempted to sexually assault her. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff sustained an injury to her person, at 1:30 P.M. on February 9, 2004, just after she was discharged from a NYCTA bus. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff sustained an injury to her person, at 1:30 P.M. on February 9, 2004, just after she was discharged from a NYCTA bus. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 10:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff sustained an injury to her person, at 1:30 P.M. on February 9, 2004, just after she was discharged from a NYCTA bus. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:30 am
  The three criteria to be proved under the local controversy exception are: (1) whether “significant relief is sought” from a local defendant under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
 Since about 30 percent of the mice developed cancer, and a can of soda has about 1/1,000 of the amount of 4-MI administered to the mice, that would equate to 30 cancer cases in every 100,000 people. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:12 pm by Ilya Somin
On an unknown date prior to May 20, 2023, but subsequent to January 1, 2023, the defendant affixed a collar to Bear Number 119 which contained a camera. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
First, ¶ 6.1 of the Agreement1 provides that GYPC, as seller, and the Third‐Party Defendants, 1 Paragraph 6.1 of the Agreement states: Indemnification by the Seller and Principals. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation… [read post]