Search for: "EVANS v. US "
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 1:45 pm
The issue in Romer v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
”).NAXOS Rights US INC. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:38 am
Chrysler Corp, 106 F.R.D. 364, 366 (D.R.I. 1985); Evans v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Sarah Evans and Kathryn Adamson preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Evans. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 4:16 pm
Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 4:16 pm
Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
Evans as a single joint expert and/or in permitting Mr. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
Evans as a single joint expert and/or in permitting Mr. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
HHS and Gill v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:27 am
Pearson of Hickey & Evans, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Facts/Discussion: Foxley is a corporation involved in cattle ranching operations. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:47 am
So you'll forgive us if we have a little fun with Cynosure, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm
Enigma Software Group v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 6:20 pm
Please visit our homepage to learn more about our firm, and contact us for legal assistance. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
The New International Law Blog offers more commentary on the latest ICJ decision in Belgium v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:12 pm
IHR Sec., LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
Bell-v-Cystic-Complaint [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
The publishing and academic worlds are watching the clock tick down to the perhaps historic decision of federal judge Orinda Evans in Cambridge University Press et al v. [read post]
