Search for: "English v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 6,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:11 am
Martinez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:43 pm
Can the State get a do over? [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
Leandra English v Trump et Mulvaney Non-news in lieu of Big News: Oral arguments heard 12/22, English bid for preliminary injunction taken under advisement. - Docket with Amici Roster and List of AttorneysLeandra-English-v-Mulvaney-and-President-Trump-CFPB-Leadership-Fight 12/27/17NCSLT is an original creditor? [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am
Bankruptcy court of 23 July 2008 against the appellants for payment of various sums of money in excess of $8 million be enforced as a judgment of the English court? [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:48 pm
In the absence of English translation of foreign language documents filing mistakes can happen. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
The decision in Von Hannover v Germany (No. 2) is the second of two given on 7 February 2012 by the Grand Chamber concerning the balancing of privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:55 am
The post Catching Up on NetChoice v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 10:55 pm
Sumitomo objected stating that English courts alone had the jurisdiction to set aside the arbitral award. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Black v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hansen Knick v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:00 am
Maclean v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
The third issue of 2011 of the Dutch journal on Private International Law, Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht includes the following contributions on the Brussels I Recast (lis pendens and choice of court), Voluntary Assignment, and case notes on TNT Express v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Davies v. [read post]
