Search for: "FRANKS v. STATE" Results 1061 - 1080 of 4,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
  A Constitution Day plea for the study of state constitutions (Real Clear Politics). [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:36 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
The Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in March 2019 and last week directed the parties to file letter briefs regarding what action the Fifth Circuit panel should take in light of the en banc Fifth Circuit’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:16 am by Adam Levitin
The class action suits argue that under the 2d Circuit's Madden v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At National Review’s Bench Memos blog, Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 1:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Mrs Elanga Longane et al  v Frank Mukahanana and Wealth Harbour Consulting Ltd LON/00AH/HMG/2018/0002 (Copy of decision) This FTT decision on a rent repayment order application raises a couple of interesting issues. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am by Florian Mueller
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]