Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 1061 - 1080 of 14,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
 The judge rejected in this regard the contrary conclusion that our Constitutional Court reached in S v Mamabolo. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:45 pm
  It was fine for plaintiff's medical expert to attach the plaintiff's medical records as support for his opinion. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm by Michael McCann
Their core argument is that the NFL lockout and various NFL restrictions on trade, including the draft, are illegal under federal antitrust law -- an argument also made in Brady v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:39 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Prosecutors in Brooklyn last week entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with defendant Joseph Lewis, II, completing the alleged antiquities trafficking case of United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Lamparello, Adam, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
The Court will not want a repeat of the calamitous decision in Bush v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:28 pm by Dan Murphy
Level One drug misdemeanors include: unlawful possession of controlled substances listed in Schedule III, IV or V, not including ketamine or flunitrazepam possession of more than 6 ounces but not more than 12 ounces or marijuana or not more than 3 ounces of marijuana concentrate attempting to commit a Level Four drug felony Beginning on March 1, 2020, the penalty for unlawful possession is up to 2 years on probation, a possible 180 days in jail, and a fine of up to $1,000. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
”50 A fine is less expensive and just as efficacious as a deterrent if the fine is set at the proper level. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
I am pleased to publish below a guest post from Rhonda Prussack, Executive Vice President and Product Manager, Fiduciary Liability, for Chartis, and her colleague at Chartis, Larry Fine, Global Head Professional Liability Claims, Financial Lines Claims. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:32 pm
Thomas Barnett, the Justice Department’s antitrust chief, expressed concern earlier this week over the EU’s Court of First Instance decision dismissing Microsoft’s appeal of a landmark 2004 decision by the EU and upholding nearly $700 million in fines. [read post]