Search for: "Foote v. Grant" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 7:49 am by Mark Zamora
We grant the writ and quash the order.Natalie Prince suffered injuries to her neck, back and foot in an accident. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, the court will grant the third-party motion to seal. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Cal. 2011) (granting anti-SLAPP motion to strike right of publicity claim), appeal pending, Nos. 11-56986, 12-55429; see also Tyne v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
Probably a trademark issue (China Hearsay) What can a famous foot brand do against footwear using its mark? [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm by Barry Eagar
It relied on the offering for sale and sale of wine bearing the registered trade mark in Australia by Beach Avenue.In the Federal Court the primary judge found that Gallo failed in its alleged infringement case and that relief should be granted. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am by Amy Howe
  The justices also granted review on Friday in: Smith v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
SP Power Systems Limited NKT applied to court to enforce an adjudication award made under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 in the amount of about £2.1million. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:08 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Hikma petitioned the Supreme Court to grant certiorari and review the majority decision. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
Grinch.I wouldn't touch you, with a thirty-nine-and-a-half foot pole.You're a vile one, Mr. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:45 am by Paul Cassell
The majority, however, stands on weaker footing in concluding that the district judge could not even hold a hearing on the dismissal motion. [read post]