Search for: "German v. United States" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2009, 8:41 am
Publication of a photo on a German website does not constitute "publication" in the United States sufficient to require the copyright owner to register the photo before suing for copyright infringement in a US court. * Sony v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 9:38 am
Cloud, a Pennsylvania case in which the RIAA's outlandish statutory damages theory is being contested by a sole practitioner battling several of the RIAA's law firms, the United States Department of Justice has filed papers indicating that it is considering intervening in the case on the side of the RIAA: United States Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Determine if Intervention is AppropriateI urge all of my readers to:1. write to Pres. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:04 am by Viking
" KIVITV reports that: United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Charles Kotuby
“Available in the United States,” however, could mean simply that the evidence is obtainable via legal process in the United States; it need not mean that the evidence is physically located in the United States. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:34 am by Katherine Pompilio
West, Brookings senior fellow; Isabel V. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
While Haley remarked that the United States does want closer relations with Russia, she made clear that American sanctions on Russia would remain in place due to the “dire situation in the Ukraine. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
  * No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
| The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks | A Creative Commons-Licensed Work Walks into a Copy Shop - Great Minds v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 6:19 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  It will apply, by its terms, to all devices and systems manufactured, sold, or used in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am by Jason Rantanen
  Moreover, Judge Higginson points out that both HTC and Ericsson, as well as the United States as amicus curiae, requested jury instructions on apportionment. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:52 am by Lyle Denniston
United States is whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s ban on destroying a “tangible object” includes only materials like documents or other records, or also includes a physical object like a fish. [read post]