Search for: "Glass v. State" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 7:20 am
The problem is that the Supreme Court of the United States saw fit to condone this type of warrantless intrusion known as a sobriety check in the 1992 case of Michigan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
The Katonomist rounds off her analysis with a discussion of the IP implications and a glass of chianti.AG Szpunar says that time-limited e-lending is allowed under EU law and interpretation of copyright norms must evolve with technology Eleonora explores the legal issues connected with the lending of e-books through libraries, as discussed by the AG in Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, C-174/15.Advocate General Szpunar considers Rubik's Cube shape… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:36 am
 There the Court found assistance from Lord Walker in the House of Lords decision in Synthon v SmithKline Beecham. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:37 am by Kevin Healey
--Beaumont 2005, orig. proceeding). 7 Independent Insulating Glass/Sw., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:54 am by Jamison Koehler
 As the Massachusetts Supreme Court put it so well in Goodridge v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:42 pm by Joy Waltemath
Summary judgment was therefore granted on her Title VII and state law claims (Graves v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm by Robert B. Lamm
  Eric Glass advises that “[v]irtually all bonds issued in the municipal market with maturities greater than 10 years come with a 10-year call option to be triggered at the discretion of the issuer”. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm by Robert B. Lamm
  Eric Glass advises that “[v]irtually all bonds issued in the municipal market with maturities greater than 10 years come with a 10-year call option to be triggered at the discretion of the issuer”. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Gene Quinn
  Today it was only about 10:12 am when it became clear no more decisions would issue today and that none of the four that were issued were styled Bilski v. [read post]