Search for: "HAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm by John Elwood
§ 922(g), which the court was holding for United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:04 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bourgass & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 16-17 February 2015. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
On the other hand, economics was never my sole driving force. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Dan Bushell
Gore and Ted Olson, who represented former President Bush in that case, and served as Solicitor General after it -- could come up with a way to convince the courts (most importantly, a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States) to find a Constitutionally protected right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm by Florian Mueller
Considering how many cert petitions the SCOTUS has to decide on at any given point in time, one may or (as I do) may not believe that an incredibly deep analysis of such questions as whether declaring code is more or less functional than other program code has occurred so far.As for the second question, I would be thoroughly surprised if the Department of Justice determined that Google's agenda in this context is in the interest of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
In Section 540F of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Congress directed the Department of Defense to conduct a feasibility study, and to report the findings of that study, on a potential new “alternative military justice system. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In Minister of Defence and Military Veterans v Motau, the court referred to deference as part of its determination of the justiciability of the impugned decision under administrative law and placed particular emphasis on the policy dimension of the decision at hand as a key factor in such determination. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Jay Levine
Not surprisingly, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and plaintiffs’ bar have been pushing for an expansive reading of the law so that more such sales would be governed by American antitrust law. [read post]