Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 9:22 am by Bruce Nye
  And the Chron also quotes predictions, accurate in CBL's view, that this issue is headed to the Cal Supremes. [read post]
14 May 2009, 3:00 am
Supreme Court unanimously rejected the claim of a California medical marijuana distribution group that it was exempted, by reason of medical necessity, from federal drug laws. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
As chief judge of the Ninth Circuit Court, Judge Kozinski heads a panel that reviews court employee workplace grievances. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:11 pm
The divestitures are intended to remedy the Justice Department’s antitrust concerns.The complaint and proposed consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
In the end, Moats was released, but a firestorm of controversy ensued, and earlier this week the officer was placed on administrative leave, with no less than the Dallas Police Chief apologizing to Moats and his family and stating that the officer's behavior was inappropriate.Moats, by the way, is a running back for the Houston Texans.Fifteen hundred miles to the West, in Buena Park, California, Joseph Ramirez was sitting in the parking lot of a Rite-Aid taking a brief nap while… [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
WARNING: this post may plant the lyrics to “Hotel California” in your mind. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
Cruz is a Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Brianne Gorod argues that the oral argument in Janus v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
(Thanks to Rick Hasen, of the University of California, Irvine School of Law, for the heads-up about the new briefing order. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 11:38 am by Norman Gregory Fernandez
Unruh Civil Rights, Act CC 51, et seq. and Cohen V California, a Supreme Court ruling, that stated that individuals have the right under the First Amendment to wear clothing which displays writing or designs. [read post]