Search for: "HOLMES v. STATE" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
United States, 250 U.S. 616,630 (1919) (Holmes, J., dissenting).] [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
One such lawsuit was a class action filed against Company A in Indiana state court. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
One such lawsuit was a class action filed against Company A in Indiana state court. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm by Sandy Levinson
That's really a stupid slogan, since, as Holmes said, taxes are the price we pay for civilization (even if we recognize the possibility of taxes being excessive). [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:13 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
The book’s endorsement of Lewis’s many national-consensus pronouncements is most egregious in the instance of the Warren Court’s 1961 decision in Mapp v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Holmes, Benjamin Cardozo, Louis Brandeis, and Robert Jackson, and Judge Learned Hand). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Common Law (1882). [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Common Law (1882). [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am by Susan Brenner
Heeb's stated results support his overarching conclusion, namely that skill predominates over chance in poker. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
McDonald, UNSECURED CLAIMS FOR CONTRACT-BASED ATTORNEY'S FEES: FOBIAN IS DEAD, BUT DOES JUSTICE HOLMES' DECISION IN RANDOLPH & RANDOLPH v. [read post]