Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 1061 - 1080 of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 7:03 am by Mark S. Humphreys
She was treated free of charge at United States Army hospitals by virtue of her husband's military status. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
Although the reasoning is different, the result would be similar to that of the Lanza decision in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:27 am by Gene Killian
Let’s review an Illinois case from a few years back, United Stationers Supply Co v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
The United States as amicus curiae suggested a test, see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27–29, but Samsung and Apple did not brief the issue. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
  In Bateman v Mnemonics (1996), the court there stated that because fair use is a statutory doctrine, fair use is not an infringement. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:05 am by Kate Evans
Barr, an effort by Clemente Pereida, who has lived in the United States without authorization for nearly 25 years, to avoid mandatory deportation by presenting evidence to an immigration judge that his deportation would cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen son. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Hannah R. Albion
Creative expression through the sale of parody-based dog toys has recently caught the attention of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:06 am by Matthew Kolken
  Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.comTaken from SCOTUSBlog.com Holder v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:21 pm by sandylaw
A case that was decided February 21, 2012 by the United States Supreme Court should send shock waves through the resident alien community. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The development of this business model has troubled the Courts in the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
”Over 500 cases have cited Mezei with approval, including the Ninth Circuit, which quoted it in United States v. [read post]