Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 69,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 8:50 am
The issue is whether a federal habeas claim is "procedurally defaulted" because it has been presented twice to the state courts, and whether a federal habeas court is powerless to recognize that a state court erred in holding that state law precludes reviewing a claim.He adds that the case is "scheduled to be considered at the Conference of June 5. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
Douglas v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court’s “anti-commandeering” doctrine holds that the federal government lacks authority under the Constitution simply to order state governments to implement federal programs or act affirmatively in other ways. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 23 (Dec. 19, 2006) on the case United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm
In McKenzie Check Advance of Florida LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:29 pm
John Ward Holding: Rulings on JMOLs As I posted last month, a Marshall jury in the Mondis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:35 am
These are Florida Prepaid v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 3:18 pm
“The extension is requested,” the motion said, “because the federal government intends to move to hold this appeal in abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s decision in King v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 8:43 am
In Bowen v Oregon, the Petitioner is asking the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:53 am
One significant case that I discuss in my William Jennings Bryan book is Allgeyer v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 2:00 pm
In that case, Glossip v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:28 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 6:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
Here is the abstract: In 1874, the Supreme Court held in Murdock v City of Memphis that it lacked “jurisdiction” to review a state supreme court’s interpretation of state law, even in cases that present federal-law claims. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 9:06 am
Aegis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
Baze v. [read post]
