Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 8:15 am
You could make them sell it to you, to be bought back, with interest, over time. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:09 am
No evidentiary hearing was required where ex-wife did not allege operative facts that would entitle her to relief under Civ.R. 60(B)(5) since she did not give a reason in her affidavit for waiting 27 years before requesting the relief. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
(b)? [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:33 am
Conservatorship The Court, having considered the circumstances of the parents and of the child, finds that the following orders are in the best interest of the child. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:03 am
Don Pease (D-OH) may cap or phase out certain deductions. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:03 am
The evidence relied upon the Massachusetts appellate court demonstrates that the U.S. company provided: (a) engineering and product design drawings, data and information; (b) process, production, inflation, maintenance, testing and inspection methods; (c) quality standards; (d) factory and general management methods; and (e) other documents and information providing a broad range of technical and managerial support by the U.S. defendant. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
The value (as outlined under § 24(d)(1)(B)(i)) used to determine the amount of refundable credit is $3,000. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
§ 2423(b)). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
§ 1396p(b)(4); and (2) if not, whether 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm
Under N.J.A.C. 10:122D-1.4(a) and (d), a written visitation plan must be developed for every child in an out-ofhome placement which must include visits with siblings, either with parental visits or separately. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
Majauskas, 61 NY2d 481, 489-490; Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][5][d][6]). [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:48 am
Today’s decision teaches appointed counsel that even if hell freezes over, he or she’d better keep on feebly waving that blow torch. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am
So many interesting issues. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
The only thing an Illinois divorce litigant needs to allege is that “[i]rreconcilable differences have caused the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and the court determines that efforts at reconciliation have failed or that future attempts at reconciliation would be impracticable and not in the best interests of the family. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
§ 547(a), states the conditions under which a preference can be avoided in §§ 547(b) and (d), and lists exceptions to preference avoidance in §§ 547(c) and (h). [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 8:37 am
John B. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Originally grew out of access to medicine, and that really is about patents/R&D. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
D/B/A LEXUS OF ORLANDO, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:20 pm
”That Act also talks about exposing a child to domestic violence. [read post]
