Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF A SUBPOENA." Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
The parties disagree over whether Preib has standing to quash the subpoena. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:00 am by Xiang Li
  In addition, the new IP Tribunals are China’s first courts/tribunals to hear civil, administrative and criminal IP matters under a single tribunal, which could minimize the inconsistencies caused by different tribunals handling the same subject matter. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
EEOC, the court ruled that courts of appeals should review a district court order to enforce or quash an EEOC subpoena for abuse of discretion, not de novo. [read post]
Regarding the second factor, the Supreme Court held that the decision to enforce or quash an EEOC subpoena is case-specific, and one that does not depend on a neat set of legal rules. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm by Joy Waltemath
“Because the District Court erred as a matter of law in demanding that the EEOC show more than relevance in order to gain enforcement of its subpoena,” Justice Ginsburg would not disturb the court of appeals’ judgment. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:34 pm by Jon Katz
” In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Mar. 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, n. 19 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:44 pm by Annette Burns
 And will the court enforce that agreement? [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Helen Klein Murillo
The statute makes it a crime to “willfully and contrary to [an] oath state[] or subscribe[] any material matter which he does not believe to be true. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
Author’s note: Although I consulted with CIA and NSA officials regarding the accuracy of certain portions of this article (and I am grateful for their assistance), and although the article was reviewed by the government to ensure that it does not contain classified information, the views expressed are solely my own, and errors solely my responsibility. *** On January 18, 2017, the CIA declassified and released new internal Central Intelligence Agency Activities:  Procedures Approved by… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:35 pm by Philip B. Phillips
The company refused to comply and the EEOC took the matter to court seeking enforcement of the subpoena. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am by John Jascob
New York also cited concerns voiced by several federalism scholars who argued that this type of subpoena can put state sovereignty at risk, and it may disrupt an ongoing enforcement matter.Separately, Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh announced that 15 state attorneys general sent a letter to Chairman Smith urging him to withdraw subpoena requests made to New York and Massachusetts. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 2:09 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
As Helen previously wrote, recusal enforcement is primarily a matter of political pressure and not actual rules or law. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  As part of these changes, the new procedures shorten the time that the examiners will issue early subpoena warnings and subpoenas to compel taxpayers to produce requested data. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 6:47 am by Susan Hennessey, Benjamin Wittes
While the subject matter overlaps, the executive branch and the legislative branch are conducting different investigations for different purposes. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Andrew Kent
FBI Director James Comey certainly made some errors in his handling of the Hillary Clinton email matter. [read post]