Search for: "In Interest of Mann"
Results 1061 - 1067
of 1,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2006, 7:57 am
Our only witness left to testify is Professor Ronald Mann. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 11:32 am
Manne and Wright intervene. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 6:08 pm
The next interesting question in my mind, then, is whether, as I assumed above, companies that violate some rules are more likely to violate other rules. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 2:26 pm
Mann and Ornstein have a number of specific changes to suggest in congressional rules and procedures -- and in lobbying regulations. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 11:11 am
As to “why backdating,” there seems to be little interest in figuring out what economic and institutional conditions led to the widespread adoption of option backdating and whether the practice is an efficient element of a compensation contract or something more sinister. [read post]
14 Jun 2006, 5:37 am
Manne, dean emeritus of the George Mason University School of Law. [read post]
6 Apr 2006, 1:29 pm
Lawyer Simon Hart has sent me this very interesting email, and has allowed its reproduction:I was involved in the recently decided Macrossan case [2006] EWHC 705 (Ch) before the High Court in England which I believe will be of interest to intellectual property lawyers and anyone who follows UK patent law. [read post]
