Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 1061 - 1080
of 18,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
The underlying appeal that prompted the Florida Supreme Court’s rule change was University of Florida Board of Trustees, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:43 pm
La Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples est véritablement à la croisée des chemins. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
For example, in Hanahoe v Hussey [1998] 3 IR 69, [1997] IEHC 173 (14 November 1997) and Gray v Minister for Justice [2007] 2 IR 654, [2007] IEHC 52 (17 January 2007) (extensively discussed here, here, and here), the plaintiffs recovered damages in respect of leaks by Gardaí of their private information. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:20 pm
Yet, I still have some difficulty reconciling the Chief Justice's opinions in Allen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
We’re meant to find that shocking!) [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
We’re meant to find that shocking!) [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
Lauzon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
That question is the basis of a lawsuit filed by the ACLU, the National Immigrant Justice Center, and the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies in U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:25 am
Re had a related post titled “Did Justice Jackson Actually Recuse from Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:09 pm
Perhaps the only important revelation came when Senator Ted Cruz of Texas asked if Jackson would recuse from Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
Justice Thomas's omission may relate to the fact that he has joined two opinions (City of Boerne v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
I read Justice Gorsuch's decision as broader in some respects than some may hope it is. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:53 am
Jamelle Bouie raises a very interesting point from Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent in Biden v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
In a separate opinion, Justice Barrett offers a thoughtful explication of that doctrine. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:48 am
” Milenkovic v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
In the 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
