Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 1061 - 1080 of 5,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2010, 2:29 pm
Three motions were at issue in this matter:  (1) by plaintiff to amend her complaint to assert a claim for consequential damages; (2) by plaintiff to compel the disclosure of certain email and fax communications between Harleysville and its contractor, and its attorneys and the contractor, withheld as privileged; and (3) by Harleysville to compel an appraisal of plaintiff's building loss. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am by Broc Romanek
Meanwhile, AT&T is trying to exclude a 10 percent special meeting resolution under a different SEC rule--14a-8(i)(10)--by arguing that it has "substantially implemented" that proposal. [read post]
The rules implement amendments to Delaware law, adopted last year, granting the Chancery Court jurisdiction to arbitrate certain business disputes, and compliment rules already in place governing the Court’s mediation of business and technology disputes. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by JB
It was part of the point of adopting Sections 1 and 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The appeal of the opponent (appellant) is directed against the decision of the opposition division concerning the maintenance of European patent number 1 609 239 in amended form on the basis of the main request filed during the oral proceedings of 19 May 2015.II. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian had a piece “The Trump rule? [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
There were no major amendments to these rules during the revision of the EPC; R 152(11) corresponds to R 101(9) EPC 1973.[2.2] The “Decision of the President of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations” (OJ EPO special edition 3/2007, 128, hereinafter referred to as “DecFilAuth”) was based on R 152(1). [read post]
Having been consulted, the part that he played and the influence which he exerted were matters for his political judgment. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:44 am by Florian Mueller
Nokia used a football (soccer) analogy, and in low-scoring games it doesn't matter whether you try 10, 20 or 30 times before you score a goal: at the end of the day, you just have to score more than your rival.Nokia has a patent portfolio of enormous breadth and depth and can always bring new assertions. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:16 pm by Ronald F. Wick
The court determined that while it would be unreasonable to require Sprint to compile a full list of class members over the 10-year class period because it would require 6-12 months of work and cost at least $1 million, Sprint’s records showed that Sprint could potentially identify subsets of customers who were members of the class. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:14 am by Gerard Magliocca
” Perhaps some future court will distinguish Exxon from a suit against BP, but the opinion is awfully clear that a 1:1 rule is the law. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:11 am by Stephen Page
 Recommendation 10 Combined rules for the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia should provide for proceedings to be conducted under Pt VII Div 12A of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) by judges of both courts. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The Opposition Division decided to maintain the patent in amended form according to an auxiliary request filed by the patent proprietor.IV. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
Whether the harassment offence in section 10 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 should be amended to incorporate a specific reference to cyber-harassment, including indirect cyber-harassment (…); 2. [read post]