Search for: "John Doe 2 "
Results 1061 - 1080
of 12,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Tim Kevan, a good mate, has branched out with a new series of humorous law post on his Barrister blog: My new series of humourous legal posts Professor John Flood’s RATs blog is another of my favourites – veering as it does between the serious and irreverent. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
” So does the Supreme Court of the United States have a legitimacy problem? [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:26 am
” The first prong of the inquiry under Section 2(e)(2), that the primary significance of the term in the mark sought to be registered is the name of a place generally known to the public, is not satisfied.And so the Board reversed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Hat tip to FOB's John Egbert and Kevin Wilson, perennial Meet-the-Bloggers attendees.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:33 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(5) refusal of the container configuration shown below, for "milk," finding the design to be de jure functional under Section 2(e)(5). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Thus, it does make sense to use a special monitor and have him or her publicly report to the court on the failures by Boeing. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:11 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:21 am
Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:26 pm
Does that include the possibility of a nuclear strike? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:51 pm
Based on the article the author Jason Zweig does not appear have good understanding of this segment of the market. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:10 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 3:34 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
The Board reverses about 1 in 10 Section 2(d) refusals, or on the average about two per month. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Kurt Lash, The Reconstruction Amendments: The Essential Documents (University of Chicago Press, 2021)(2 vols.). [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 4:38 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
. , 2:10cv00132 (E.D. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm
(John Elwood) There may not be much interest among the general readership in today’s opinion in Stolt-Nielsen SA v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 3:51 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:35 am
§ 51-2-7, as amended July 1, 1985. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:45 am
" Nestle Prepared Foods Company v.V&V Enterprises Incorporated, Opposition No. 91167465 (March 10, 2011) [not precedential].Applicant filed its brief five days late, mistakenly relying on the five-extra-days-mail-service rule (2.119(c)), which does not apply when the due date is set by Board order. [read post]
