Search for: "Kelly v. Kelly" Results 1061 - 1080 of 3,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 10:59 am by Nicole Mazzocco
Justice Cavanagh concurred, joined by Chief Justice Kelly. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, reversed the Supreme Court's decision on the law, explaining that an administrative penalty or sanction must be upheld unless it is "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 7:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals upholds dismissal, and the case is over.The case is Giudice v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division then decided to address the merits of the appeal "in the interest of judicial economy", citing Matter of DeMonico v Kelly, 49 AD3d 265. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“ '[V]iolation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive’ as [*2]opposed to conduct which is negligent” (Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly, 191 AD3d at 762 [citation omitted], quoting Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Gama Endustri Tesisleri Imalat Montaj AS v Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment [2005] IEHC 119 (22 April 2005) (Kelly J), Cogley v Radio Telifís Eireann [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J) and Murray v Newsgroup Newspapers [2010] IEHC 248 (Irvine J) are all to similar effect. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
A police force is a quasi-military organization and its members are subject strict disciplineMatter of Lundy v City of Oswego, 2009 NY Slip Op 00772, Decided on February 6, 2009, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentGeorge Lundy sued the City of Oswego and its mayor in an effort to annul a Civil Service Law Section 75 determination terminating his employment as Oswego's Chief of Police.The Appellate Division found that the disciplinary determination was supported by the requisite… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
As noted in Kelly v Levin, 440 NY2d 424, even if these individuals were given a due process hearing, the only penalty that could be imposed by an appointing authority or hearing officer was dismissal.* For the purposes of 30(1)(e), a plea of guilty is the equivalent of a conviction.. [read post]