Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 1061 - 1080 of 6,677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2012, 4:06 am
The highest court in the land, the United States Supreme Court, should render a decision on this same issue early next year in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
Court of Appeal (details required in resolution of necessity) United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land - 11th Circuit ("pretext" in compensation -- intent to depress valuation in anticipation of condemnation) Resource Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am by Guest Blogger
  In response, the State of Wyoming argued—as it had successfully below—that the dispute was squarely governed by the Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:57 am by Andrew Alberg
”  The decision may force the United States to pay out claims to all the landowners whose land was converted to bike paths and running trails by the Government as part of its rails-to-trails operation. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation)Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 11:53 pm
  Pennsylvania's Lands Act prohibits local government units from utilizing eminent domain to take land to preserve open space, but the Township Code allows local government to take property for recreational purposes. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:28 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm by Evan Lee
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
 (quoting United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, 80 F.3d 1074, 1078 (5th Cir. 1996)).[6] Although this is a change in Florida procedural law, it most likely will not have much of an effect on the admissibility of expert witnesses in state court cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
 (quoting United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, 80 F.3d 1074, 1078 (5th Cir. 1996)).[6] Although this is a change in Florida procedural law, it most likely will not have much of an effect on the admissibility of expert witnesses in state court cases. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:01 am by Jon Robinson
Amicus Brief for the United States: The ability to float does not make a structure a “vessel. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 3:58 pm
Two interesting land use cases will be heard by the Hawaii appellate courts in the coming months.The first case is Unite Here! [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm by Unknown
H.R.4093 - To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify the distribution of funds under the tribal transportation program, and for other purposes. [read post]