Search for: "Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2021, 12:14 pm by Victoria Gallegos
They argue that Trump’s speech on Jan. 6 is protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 1:43 pm
Public in the respect that it is not a Government department (or connected to one), and isn't staffed by civil servants, but is still subject to requirements relating to freedom of information, standards in public life, and The Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Outside the Inquiry, meanwhile, there have been significant developments in the criminal investigation and the civil litigation. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am by Matthew Kahn
In his seminal law review article with Samuel Warren entitled “The Right to Privacy” and in his famous and farsighted dissent in the 1928 Supreme Court case of Olmstead v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 5:34 am
Council on Human Rights, the lawyer representing the U.S. was the only one who defended the practice, insisting the U.S. is careful not to violate international law. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 3:13 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Non-exclusive right to republish granted to Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 8:12 am by Howard M. Wasserman
In response to questions from Ginsburg and Gorsuch, Herstoff explained that 59(e) refers to a judgment, which under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(a) “includes a decree and any order from which an appeal lies” and covers final and interlocutory orders and appeals of right and discretionary appeals. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
However civil rights groups including Liberty, Big Brother Watch and Amnesty have condemned its use as “suspicionless mass surveillance that turns us into walking ID cards. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:47 am by William Ford
A slightly different but kindred proposal is also under consideration. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm by Adam Wagner
Justice: The human rights organisation is squarely against the proposals:“The Government has a duty – grounded in human rights law – to protect the public from the harm connected with serious risks associated with threats to national security, such as terrorism. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:24 pm by Nathan
 Liberals, ostensibly champions of civil rights, trample those rights in order to advance their regulatory agenda. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by Ahimsa Wickrematunge
In 2019, we filed a civil lawsuit in federal court in California – where Gotabaya had fled after the civil war before returning to Sri Lanka to become president – under the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victims Protection Act, federal laws that allow for civil suits in U.S. courts to remedy certain human rights violations. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:02 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Or what’s the outcomes that we want to see before these students and new lawyers show up at our door? [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:43 am
  For example, one of my favorite quotes, when Dan Markel at PrawfsBlawg chastised me for using the phrase "circle jerk" to describe the internal goals of law review articles: impress their tenure committee. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
” Citing a related case in a different regulated profession in Erdmann v Complaints Inquiry Committee, the Discipline Committee effectively stated, [20] Professionals in every walk of life have private lives and should enjoy, as much as possible, the rights and freedoms of citizens generally. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:57 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
To catch up on this latest guidance, Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]